The rapid spread of COVID-19 overwhelmed hospitals that were unable to contend with the increasing number of patients, many requiring ventilators and other critical care. Such conditions can put medical workers at risk. Now researchers are studying methods to increase hospital safety and efficacy during the pandemic.
A shortage of life-saving ventilators, which typically cost around $30,000 each, hit hospitals particularly hard. “By building a simple and cheap ventilator, we can help alleviate this burden for the medical staff,” says Mohamed Amine Abassi, a PhD student in fluid mechanics.
Based on a prototype designed by his advisor, engineering professor Xiaofeng Liu, Abassi spearheaded an effort with colleagues from San Diego State University and the University of California San Diego to build such a device from readily available parts—plastic tubing, pressure valves, humidifier—and an air supply. Then they tested it.
Preliminary results shared at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society’s Division of Fluid Dynamics suggest the ventilator meets essential requirements set by the U.S. FDA. It is fully controllable on three parameters—air pressure, inspiration time, and Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP)—with plans for more controls in the works.
Abassi and Liu foresee the ventilators assisting not just overwhelmed hospitals in the United States but also in developing countries and rural areas with limited medical infrastructure. “If they can build it at home, they can use it,” says Abassi. “And you can build many of these ventilators in a very short time.”
Patients on ventilators who have some pulmonary conditions relevant to COVID-19 with underlying chronic lung diseases will often receive drugs like albuterol through an endotracheal tube. This treatment relaxes the bronchial muscles and improves airflow to the constricted lung airways.
A group from Pa.-based Lehigh University and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences sought the most effective methods for administering albuterol via ventilator. Ariel Berlinski and his group conducted aerosol characterization experiments at the University of Arkansas. Rahul Rajendran at Lehigh used the results to investigate drug delivery through computations.
“The research objective was to evaluate the efficiency of drug delivery when the nebulizer type and its placement were varied in the ventilator circuit,” says Arindam Banerjee, a member of the group and a Lehigh professor of mechanical engineering and mechanics.
The researchers found that a vibrating mesh (rather than a jet) nebulizer placed on the dry side of the humidifier delivers the highest dose to the lung. Administering albuterol through intubation works most effectively for smaller particles, while oral administration is more efficient for larger particles. “Our results are vital for mechanical ventilator-based treatment,” says Banerjee.
Even in optimal circumstances, healthcare workers still risk contracting COVID-19. A new respiratory apparatus could reduce exhaled aerosols, which are known to transmit the virus that causes the disease.
Researchers from Liberty University and Vapotherm wondered how common respiratory treatments would affect aerosol emissions. So, they decided to test a proposed design for a PVC face mask connected to suction, adding a high-velocity nasal insufflation cannula—the kind of tubed device that delivers oxygen to the nose.
Then, with input from medical experts, they modeled a hospital room with two patients and four caregivers using highly sophisticated computational techniques. According to their model, when patients wear the new apparatus, fewer particles reach the healthcare workers. “It represents an inexpensive way to reduce the spread of airborne contagion using supplies commonly found in hospital rooms already,” says engineering PhD candidate Reid Prichard. “This will remain an important tool even after the pandemic is over.”
Another group from the University of South Florida, led by mechanical engineering PhD student Anthony Perez, is investigating what happens to any aerosol contaminants that patients do emit into a hospital isolation room—and how quickly the contaminants leave the room. “As many hospitals are reaching capacity, ensuring a hospital room is safe to enter after an aerosol-generating procedure—or after the removal of a previous patient so hygiene workers can prepare the room—requires significant down time,” says Perez.
According to the researchers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ventilation recommendations assume pathogen-containing aerosols are perfectly mixed within a room. Using numerical simulations, the group finds that imperfect mixing conditions significantly affect how quickly ventilation removes pathogens from a room. “It is both surprising and somewhat concerning that the standard for air sanitization is based on what many would consider a back-of-an-envelope calculation,” says Perez.
The simulations suggest aerosol contaminants can linger in “dead zones” for around 10 minutes in a typical hospital isolation room. Meanwhile, “short circuits” expel some packets of contaminants quickly before they can disperse.
“Our research illustrates the need for a more accurate, yet inexpensive, framework for the prediction of aerosol concentrations in an arbitrary hospital room, especially in assessing the level of exposure of healthcare workers,” says Perez.